Go Back   GM Performance Tuning - 2008 > GM Performance Tuning > RSS Feeds > Cadillac Autoblog

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-30-2008, 06:02 PM
jamz's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Linden, VA / NYC
Posts: 6,062
Rep Power: 18
jamz is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to jamz Send a message via AIM to jamz Send a message via Yahoo to jamz Send a message via Skype™ to jamz
GM: Turbocharged four for the CTS? Only if customers want it.

Filed under: Coupes, Sedans/Saloons, Cadillac, GM

Click above for a high-res gallery of the 2008 Cadillac CTS.

"We're ready. When (customers) want it (the option of smaller engines) - we'll do it." That's a (somewhat mangled) quote from Thomas G. Stephens, GM's executive veep for global powertrain and quality, speaking at the inauguration of the General's Powertrain Engineering Development Center last Friday. What Stephens is referring to is the possibility of equipping Cadillacs with smaller, turbocharged engines - specifically fitting the 260-hp (or more) 2.0-liter, turbocharged four in the CTS sedan.

Sounds like a Hell of an idea, but how - exactly - is GM going to determine when consumers are ready for it? How about now?

Prices at the pump may have peaked (for now), but consumers are still craving fuel-efficient rides that don't skimp on power and poise. GM is already making V8 levels of output with its direct-injected 3.6-liter V6 (see: Camaro) and that, coupled with Stephens' quote, means that GM isn't totally oblivious to the idea of offering smaller engines that balance fuel economy and thrust in packages that might benefit from them. But again, how will the market tell GM when it's open to the idea of fewer cylinders making just as much power? Ford is already ramping up to release its line of direct inject, turbocharged EcoBoost engines, BMW has proven that turbocharged sixes are the bee's knees and practically every other automaker is looking into forced induction as a means to a lighter, more powerful, more fuel efficient end. So why is GM stalling? If the General has the capabilities, it needs to step up and let the market embrace it. It will. If GM doesn't, it risks its own extinction.

[Source: AutoObserver, Image (C)2008 John Neff]
Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments


More...
__________________
Jason Miller
Webmaster / Founder
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | Owned and Operated by Jamz Management, LLC
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Inactive Reminders By Mished.co.uk

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37